A supremely thought provoking and troubling philosophical painting by the Belgian Surrealist Rene Magritte. We are presented with a meretriciously drawn image of a pipe while beneath the neat legend paradoxically informs us that Ceci n’est pas une pipe (This is not a pipe). It seems that before us is less a painting than another one of Magritte’s monstrously banal, and ultimately terrifying, pictorial mysteries.
The pipe drawn with such painstaking exactitude is of course just a representation of a pipe. You cannot hold in your hands, stuff it with tobacco and smoke it, which is surely what is required of a pipe for it to be a pipe. Yet we feel perplexed and somehow obscurely cheated. If it the case that ‘perception always intercedes between reality and ourselves’, then all we can know are images of the world, and images are by their very nature treacherous. All we have is the map, and as everyone knows, the map is not the territory.
cakeordeathsite 
Thank you for that very lucid exposition of one interpretation of Ceci n’est pas une pipe.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you…it is the interpretation put by Magritte, though he might have been disingenuous with this one.
LikeLike
Especially like the allegory with the map… Yes. It is probably my favourite piece of Magritte. Yes, I’m very sure of it. I saw it in an exhibition (as I mentioned before, see how very boring I am), oh so very crowded it may have been, I also made up my mind. Hm. But from this time on I always smell that hot, unhealthy air and feel hands pushing my back when thinking of Magritte’s peintures, what a pity indeed.
LikeLiked by 2 people
A pity indeed. I always find them chilling, so much more is going on underneath the bland surfaces.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yesss!!! So true… Like a smooth surface of a lake… Agonisingly soothing until you feel the actual grip.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes exactly.
LikeLiked by 1 person
An artist can never tell the whole truth about his work. And if he could, how would we understand it?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very true, though this did allow me to wax philosophical.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So then can we say that it is not a painting of a pipe? đŸ™‚ I like the merry-go-round philosophy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We can and reality recedes one further step backwards…the word is not the thing. Dear oh dear now my head is spinning.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So we can never trust what our eyes see for the image may hide from us the true nature of the thing. That we even sally forth into the world is a triumph. Tread carefully, each foot step may take off you off the edge of a cliff.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So true, the word is not the thing and the map is not the territory. Just a representation and representations can lie.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Or mislead with no malicious intent. The Lie seems to have purpose doesn’t it
LikeLiked by 1 person
Be careful or you will start me off on Demiurges and other such stuff
LikeLiked by 1 person
Maybe that my plan all along
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah you won’t get me that way
LikeLiked by 1 person
And I should add, the art which points out this state of affairs in such a simple and meaningful way is just the height of brilliance. I love Magritte.
LikeLiked by 1 person
True, simple but stunning.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Perception always intercedes between reality and ourselves” : I completely agree with your statement… there is something quite naive and extremely realistic when it comes to Magritte´s painting… and yet … it seems surrealism and Realism could be linked to a certain extent… there is a fine line, or could be a fine line between those artistic movements… And we can see that in Dali´s paintings. Sometimes mundane objects could become something totally different according to how we use them. Or (maybe from Dali´s perspective): if they appear in dreams, for example.
Excellent post dear Mr Cake. Love & best wishes! đŸ˜€
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you Aquileana. Of course another way to read the painting would be that objects in dreams always have a different, symbolic meaning. Surrealism and Hyper realism are definitely related in their aims. Glad you found this as thought provoking as myself.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s a bit worrisome when artists like Magritte enter the popular culture (referenced in mainstream movies, printed on mass products and so on), because they turn into these cheap pretenses for wittiness. His riddles receive automatic answers.
Which is why it’s so refreshing to pause, think, and then look at his artwork as a whole. Genius playfulness.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Magritte and Dali are the two artists commonly associated in the popular imagination with Surrealism because their art and techniques were co-opted by advertising. Magritte started out in advertising, which gave him the idea of using words in painting, though with the express aim of subversion, however that didn’t really matter to the advertisers who appropriated his techniques. That is why I have concentrated on less familiar Surrealists as some aspects of Magritte have become over familiar, then look at them with fresh eyes. I hope you approve of my reading and thank you for the thought provoking comment.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have always thought that this image along with its message were the first intended Conceptual work the world was given: it could just so easily be ‘ceci nes pas une auto’ or ‘BigMac’ It is as if Magritte gave permission to all artists and viewers to do anything and see anything from now on. How much trouble he caused. The ripples rebound to this day.
“FAKE NEWS!”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellent point… Magritte was working in advertising when it started to remodel the world into the media landscape that saturates and dominates our consciousness today. We cannot trust what we seeing. Interestingly I posted about Trump as Situationist and spectular president. I will send you the link.
LikeLike
https://cakeordeathsite.wordpress.com/2017/12/01/the-ultimate-spectacle/
LikeLike
LikeLiked by 2 people
The SI were a big influence on punk, Malcolm McLaren was involved in an offshoot. This probably explains (but doesn’t excuse) John Lydan’s support of Trump.
LikeLike
I did not know he’d done that. But anything that stirs the world towards
LikeLiked by 1 person
anarchy is to be desired in Mr Rottens eyes. Including representing the Irish Republic in the next Eurovision!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dear oh dear it really is the End Time.
LikeLike
More and more folk are discovering that the semi tongue in cheek discourse of de-evolution that inspired Mark Mothersbaugh and the Cassalles brothers to creat DEVO in Akron Uni in 1970’s, has come into being. And scarily, each generation of humans that forgets a little more about civilisation and morality passing behaviors down the line will result in perhaps a split along the vision of Huxley. Alphas and Omegas.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That is a scary thought but totally believable.
LikeLike
I enjoy this paradox. The uncomfortable feeling comes from both the image and the words being part of the same work: if you “fall” for the representation of the pipe, i.e. if you thought of it as a pipe even for a moment, then if you *believed* the words telling you it isn’t a pipe, it feels like you were duped twice. Especially since it hits you that if the pipe was a lie, then likely the words are too, but if the words are a lie then it’s still okay to think of the image of the pipe as a pipe, so you weren’t actually duped twice…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes a dizzying vortex of disbelief begins to consume everything. Maybe language is a virus after all, and writers are the terminally ill.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It makes perfect sense, this is not a pipe.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The map is not the territory, this phrase haunts me.
LikeLiked by 1 person