
Dorothea Tanning remarked on her childhood in Galesburg, Illinois that nothing happened but the wallpaper, however everything, even wallpaper, is grist to the true artists mill and she succeeded during her long and incredibly productive life to create memorable works set in conventional domestic spaces filled with mystery, confrontation and revelation.
Family Portrait was painted in Sedona, Arizona, where Tanning lived with her husband Max Ernst for part of every year until they moved to France permanently in 1957 . The painting is dominated by the huge father (or husband) figure wearing sinister mirrored round glasses in the background. The size of each figure seems entirely dependent on their status within the family group. The perky daughter (or wife) with her large and expressive eyes sits level at the table with its crisp linen and strange dishes, dwarfing the housekeeper who is little bigger than the small dog on its hindquarters begging for its dinner. The muted colours add to the ominous and oppressive atmosphere. Family Portrait is a suburban Gothic drama of hidden tensions and Wonderland-like changes in scale that lingers unnervingly in the memory.
Tanning’s art is new to me but I like this one very much,\.
LikeLiked by 1 person
She was the last of the original Surrealists. She died in 2012 at the age of 101, she switched to sculpture in the 1970’s and then writing, her first and only novel was published at the age of 94. Two autobiographies and her last published volume of poetry was published when she was 100. Glad you enjoyed.
LikeLike
I’ve come to love this artists stunning and imaginative paintings. The symbolism here is fascinating. Thank you, I enjoyed seeing more of Tanning’s art Mr. Cake.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My pleasure expect more to come shortly. She was a great artist, as was Ernst of course.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree and look forward to more on Tanning, hopefully a glimpse into her association with Max Ernst.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They were together until Ernst’s death, though she survived him by thirty odd years. Look out for more shortly.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I shall.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Powerful, iconic. And nothing has essentially changed – the patriarch’s expression resembles Trump’s.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good spot, yes very sour and dour. It is a great painting.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Tanning is wonderful. How interesting that the father, despite his size also seems to be blending into the wall. Lots to contemplate in this one. Look forward to more on this exceptional artist.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well nothing happens but the wallpaper and he becoming the wallpaper.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, perfect!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I failed to notice the dishes on the table when in The Tate this month; on observing their detail now, one dish has a definate labial nature.
Could the family dinner be an ‘all consuming’ concept here?
Spoiler alert: I have not read ‘Chasm’ yet, so be careful with your reply.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I couldn’t possibly comment though you may have hit the nail on the head.
LikeLike
Fascinating
Surely the older lady is the wife, aged by use and diminished by time. The perky daughter has status for now: her potential value will be realised in barter, or the value she has brought in from her husband’s status. This is patriarchy in all its muted colours, with even the pudenda served at the table. The dog had the best of this I think.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellent and refreshing take on this painting Kestrel. You are probably spot on though I read it slightly differently. Glad you found it fascinating.
LikeLiked by 1 person