
Before progressing further with the study of Gnostic influences in the 20th and 21st Century, we must first consider what elements of a heresy formulated in the 1st Century AD hold relevance today, two millennia later, in an increasingly secular world with an unprecedentedly advanced technology. Obviously a Gnosticism divorced from its ancient and medieval religious milieu is going to be markedly different from the original, indeed on a number of occasions is it avowedly atheist and secular, however this adaptability is a sign of its continued power to haunt the imagination.
- Paranoia-the worldview of Gnosticism is deliriously paranoid. The whole universe is a vast cosmic conspiracy concocted by a deluded and evil Demiurge, who employs archons to make sure we keep in line and don’t realise the horrific truth. Through gnosis you could achieve awareness that you were trapped inside an immense prison and begin the escape to our true home. Unfortunately the history of the Gnostics suggests that their paranoia was to a certain extent justified, as they were definitely persecuted and were frequently burned at the stake. One of the defining characteristics of the 20th Century onward has been the ever escalating paranoia, though it is the state and ever-encroaching technologies that are the main cause of the proliferating conspiracy theories. However who could seriously doubt that the power structures are out to get us? Paranoia makes sense, though the sense it makes is completely paranoid.
- Pessimism-the idea that the material world and realm of the senses is corrupt, faulty and inherently, intrinsically evil is a rare case of religious and philosophical pessimism, as is the antinatalism adopted by the majority of Gnostic sects, both ascetic and libertine. It isn’t until Schopenhauer (though a case could be made for Marquis De Sade with his eternal, infernal universe ruled over by a malevolent Nature) that such views found a place within mainstream philosophy. Now such views can be found on a network TV series such as True Detective.
- Subjectivity–gnosis could only be found within, not from objective fact or through the mediation of an organisation such as the Church. It was personal, individual and subjective. Needless to say, ever since Kierkegaard posited his radical subjectivity, objective reality has retreated to such an extent that nobody has any clue as to whether anything actually exists outside of the confides of their own minds anymore.
- Cosmic Vision-Gnosticism with its bewildering array of emanations, aeons, syzygies and archons is very cosmically trippy and great source of material for Science Fiction, with a few updates of course. Angels and Demiurges cast as advanced alien species or computer systems.
- The Flight from Reason-The Roman Empire was the civilised world at the time. Outside of its borders lay only savages and barbarians who wanted to be Romans anyway. It was pragmatic, bureaucratic, reasonable and, one suspects, a little soul-destroying. People (on the whole) only paid lip service to the official state religion. The state may have ensured that you didn’t die of hunger, but for what purpose? Reason has only so many answers and even then we can stand only so much reason. Hence the flight from reason to embrace an exhilarating, total vision. A vision that dispels all doubt and means you just know. On this point I think the parallels are clear and apparent without any further elaboration on my part.
With all these factors in mind we can advance, with much fear and trembling, further into the Gnosticism of Modernity, which will form the second half of the series.
Very interesting, the way of adapting gnosticism to modern positions and problems. I like your reference to True Detective, hehe.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you. Hopefully I am not over extending into fancifulness. Ligoti is all over the first season of True Detective and he is profoundly pessimistic and paranoid.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I know
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sorry you know how I like to ramble on and on.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The shadow then … having a necessary part in Jung’s idea of individuation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You must have read my mind. Jung is next.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Three Rivers.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you most kindly.
LikeLike
And you know how much I like weird, gloomy and crazy stuff
LikeLiked by 1 person
Me too…obviously.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on lampmagician.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you… hopefully the series is going somewhere.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank You too, it’s surely a great research and you might put it together as a book 🙂👍
LikeLiked by 1 person
Maybe I could, but who would buy it?
LikeLiked by 1 person
A big question 😐 my brother was a writer, a real good one but he had no luck! Nowadays the writer must invest by own self at first, I’ve just thought you might have much more luck 🙂👍
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well I will keep trying…I love writing anyway and hopefully my luck will get better and better.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Amen 👍👍👍
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for your encouragement and support
LikeLiked by 1 person
It keeps me going and hopefully improving.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sorry so late to this. I am going to surmise that an atheistic Gnosticism would attribute greater forces interfering with our ability to ‘see’ clearly to technology or alien interference, something like that? Paranoia is without a doubt a central pillar of such a belief system! Who is listening and watching our every move? The system may be stacked with us or against us and we would never know the difference. Ah its a dismal progression. Very well summed up, Mr. Cake. Waiting further elaborations
LikeLiked by 1 person
Atheistic Gnosticism (not that that is actually a thing, until now) would basically attribute the powers of the Demiurge and or a distant God to the powers structures, malevolent politics, the entertainment industry, technology that holds us in thrall in an ersatz world. Really the world today is quite incomprehensible in its entirety, there is so much reality out there, and authenticity is almost impossible to achieve. With so much doubt comes the need for certainty, a revelation, gnosis, the naked lunch moment when you realise what is on the end of your fork. A negative revelation that this world must be transformed, transcended, annihilated, the need to immanentize the eschaton. Obviously this can be applied to a number of positions. Anyway more later.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I do believe people are too scared to look inside so it’s easier to be subjugated by the world, and dominating forces outside of ourselves — because then you can complain about it and make it someone else’s fault — than to stop, breathe, and see what’s really going on in there.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This series on Gnosticism, which is a work in progress, tried to be a even handed account of the gnostic worldview, the mark of which I can see in many conflicting viewpoints. As for complaining, isn’t it human nature to say ‘why me, why is the world so unfair’. That is certainly what Job did. Gnosticism tries to answer this question, but the answer is in itself problematic (I shall discuss this further later on). Thank you for your comment, hope it provided food for thought.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for your thoughtful post. 🤓
LikeLiked by 1 person
My pleasure
LikeLiked by 1 person
According to the following article, the ideology of gender identity as a psychological given independent of the biological sex, is a form of Gnosticism: https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/the-disappearance-of-desire/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellent article which shows that maybe I am on the right track in seeing Gnosticism everywhere lately (even more so since I have starting writing this series). Thank you.
LikeLike