Papin Sisters Before, After-Le Surrealisme au Service de la Revolution May 1933A dramatic subversion of a convention even before it had become a commonplace. The Papin sisters were responsible for one of the most sensational murder cases in 1930’s France. After seven years exemplary service as domestics in the Lancelin household they killed and mutilated Madame Lancelin and her daughter when a blown fuse threw the house into darkness. The sisters promptly confessed, however it was revealed during the brief trial that they were locked in an incestous lesbian relationship.
This wasn’t the first time nor would it be the last that the Surrealists venerated criminals. Earlier in the first issue of La Revolution Surrealiste they had placed mugshots of themselves around a photograph of Germaine Berton, an anarchist who had assassinated the leader of a far right party organization. Later they would advocate for Violette Noziere who poisoned both of her parents and whose subsequent spectacularly deranged testimony gripped the nation.
I once saw a movie about the Papin sisters. “Sister, My Sister,” I think it was called. Disturbing — but I think it was a good movie. Too long ago to remember.
Isn’t it? I don’t have the Berton picture, I think you are thinking of What is Hidden which features mug shots of the surrealist with eyes closed around a picture by Magritte of a naked woman. This really is the everything you didn’t need to know about obscure art movements from 1880-1939
Both good ideas. Perhaps alternating them so we don’t all want to jump off a bridge? Or find ourselves so ahem, aroused that we can’t get any work done…
This highly publicized story in France was huge, still is really, a modern folk lore almost. The P sisters were so odd, I mean it was never fully explained by them or anyone else. I love the films The Concrete Garden and Sister My Sister. In the latter that was a rough adaptation of this story but the director decided to make them definitely incestous and that’s all anyone remembers of the film but there is so much more, for example the frustrations of working in those bound positions. I always personally believed they were incestous but maybe that was a sick idea of mine, either way I felt the film really was very passionate (Jodi May I believe) and for the first time I understood the attraction among some siblings (I’m an only child) as with The Concrete Garden (Gainsborough?). In this true story though, it was more the underdog syndrome. I’d have probably done the same minus taking the eyes out, too squeamish. What was most interesting was the idea at the time that women ‘couldn’t possibly’ do this, it really threw everything previously believed under the bus.
Well the Surrealists applauded them, those Surrealists. I was always under the impression that they were incestous, but I have a lurid imagination. Ah us only children and our imaginations.
This was a huge case in France (not surprising concerning the absolute sensational aspects, it would be huge anywhere) and it raised questions concerning class, poverty, servitude and power. Interesting anyway
I once saw a movie about the Papin sisters. “Sister, My Sister,” I think it was called. Disturbing — but I think it was a good movie. Too long ago to remember.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hopefully this blog although it has a theme isn’t too predictable…that before and after is wild
LikeLiked by 2 people
It’s the truth, the before and after is absolutely wild Mr. Cake, but fascinating all the same. ~ Miss Cranes
LikeLiked by 1 person
It was shown as an example of convulsive beauty…the surrealists and their theories
LikeLiked by 1 person
What a bizarre story! And do you have the Berton mug shot photo on here? Or am I thinking of something else?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Isn’t it? I don’t have the Berton picture, I think you are thinking of What is Hidden which features mug shots of the surrealist with eyes closed around a picture by Magritte of a naked woman. This really is the everything you didn’t need to know about obscure art movements from 1880-1939
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s it. And you’re right, but think how much fun this will be for me at cocktail parties!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think I will done more in this series…I have a couple more ideas in this vein floating in my head, just need to write them, sigh
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellent! This stuff is really interesting.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you. I am also thinking about a surrealist suicide series and or a erotic classic series
LikeLiked by 1 person
Both good ideas. Perhaps alternating them so we don’t all want to jump off a bridge? Or find ourselves so ahem, aroused that we can’t get any work done…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can’t keep on one subject at a time, it would be occasional
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can’t either. Well, I’ll look forward to it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
This highly publicized story in France was huge, still is really, a modern folk lore almost. The P sisters were so odd, I mean it was never fully explained by them or anyone else. I love the films The Concrete Garden and Sister My Sister. In the latter that was a rough adaptation of this story but the director decided to make them definitely incestous and that’s all anyone remembers of the film but there is so much more, for example the frustrations of working in those bound positions. I always personally believed they were incestous but maybe that was a sick idea of mine, either way I felt the film really was very passionate (Jodi May I believe) and for the first time I understood the attraction among some siblings (I’m an only child) as with The Concrete Garden (Gainsborough?). In this true story though, it was more the underdog syndrome. I’d have probably done the same minus taking the eyes out, too squeamish. What was most interesting was the idea at the time that women ‘couldn’t possibly’ do this, it really threw everything previously believed under the bus.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well the Surrealists applauded them, those Surrealists. I was always under the impression that they were incestous, but I have a lurid imagination. Ah us only children and our imaginations.
LikeLike
Yikes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Don’t you just love the before and after photos.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Quite terrifying, actually. But yes the change is significant.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This was a huge case in France (not surprising concerning the absolute sensational aspects, it would be huge anywhere) and it raised questions concerning class, poverty, servitude and power. Interesting anyway
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very interesting
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you
LikeLiked by 1 person
How delightfully disturbing. The photographs are fascinating… shivers. Being an only child doesn’t seem so bad.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The photographs are fascinating as is the case in a very morbid manner. Trust the Surrealists to be attracted in the strangest possible way.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Attraction to the macabre is inexplicable yet we (humans) seem to be fascinated to the grotesque to some degree.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We do, I suppose because it exists and we are invariably curious. Though it does always raise unsettling questions.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is human nature to be curious about the very bizarre. That will never change 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed… I wouldn’t have anything to write about either.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We can’t have that!
LikeLiked by 1 person
No we cannot!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I doubt that would happen. We just couldn’t let it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hehe I will try not to.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Make sure you do. I am being bossy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I need that really I have a problem focusing.
LikeLiked by 1 person