In the apocryphal Book of Judith, the beautiful, daring young widow Judith (feminine form of Judah), distressed by her fellow Jews lack of faith in God to deliver them from the Assyrian conquerors, ingratiates herself with the General Holofernes. Having gained his trust she is admitted into his tent where he is lying in a drunken stupor. With the help of her loyal maid she proceeds to decapitate Holofernes and shows the severed head to an awe-struck crowd of her fellow-countrymen. The Assyrians demoralised by the loss of their leader retreat and Israel is liberated from the foreign threat.
The story of Judith was a popular source of art from the Middle Ages to the Baroque. The Symbolists interpenetration brought the perverse and sadistic elements to the forefront. The great Austrian Symbolist painter and Viennese Secessionist Gustav Klimt’s (The Succubus) Judith I of 1901 was the cause of considerable scandal when first exhibited. The focus of the painting is Judith, only a part of the decapitated head of Holofernes is shown and even that is regulated to the bottom right-hand corner, beneath Judith’s exposed breast. With an expression of rapt depravity Judith caresses the head, all set against a ornately gilded, Art Nouveau decorative background.
An interesting comparison with Klimt’s Judith is with two masterpieces from the Baroque period on the same subject, Caravaggio’s Judith Beheading Holofernes circa 1599 and Artemisia Gentileschi’s Judith Slaying Holofernes 1614-1620. Here the paintings are concerned with the act of murder itself. Caravaggio who led a tumultuous life and would die on the run after killing Ranuccio Tomassoni, manages to convey with his trademark chiaroscuro all the tension and ambivalence Judith must have felt as she saws through the neck of Holofernes, while Gentileschi’s Judith surpasses Caravaggio (she was the most famous of the Caravaggisti, followers of Caravaggio) in showing the bloodiness and sheer physicality of the scene. It has been interpenetrated as a vivid rape revenge fantasy.
It’s hard to express delight at such a gruesome story… however… it is one of my favorites despite its blood thirstiness. The Caravaggio! And of the trio you mentioned only Salome is recorded in the accepted canon, strong females being a bit of a threat (temptation, corrupter…) The Klimt painting is amazing!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I saw a church in Rome with three Caravaggio’s which he was commissioned to do and it still there. Quite possibly the best art I saw in Rome which isn’t exactly bereft of masterpieces. Brilliant painter. The Klimt is amazing I also love the Gentileschi. Judith seems like a strong woman, trust Klimt to make her sexy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s awesome. Rome is almost overwhelming. I was there just once and crowded as much in as possible. Yes Klimt’s Judith – the look on her face! 😈
LikeLiked by 1 person
I must do a post on him and Schiele… art history with a slice of Cake anyone
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, please.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You wish is my command
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ooh, nice! I should come up with a few more then
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hmmm don’t get carried away now
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh all right… but you know I’m a benevolent dictator 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not sure thing
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh you know I’m nothing but sweet and kind!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hmmmm
LikeLiked by 1 person
Awwww
LikeLiked by 1 person
Joking
LikeLike
So something about this sounded familiar and I went searching… Gentileschi painted Jael slaying Sisera with the tent peg, another win for Hebrew women. The Sisera of the painting is said to bear a resemblance to Caravaggio.
LikeLiked by 1 person
http://www.artemisia-gentileschi.com/jael-sisera.html
LikeLike
Thank you for this, she certainly didn’t shy away from scenes of violence. It does look like Caravaggio, he often inserted self portraits in his paintings, most famously as Goliath in his David with the head of Goliath, link to follow.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s fantastic. Thank you for the link. The painting is stunning and it’s always great to get the story behind it. I think Caravaggio inserted himself into The Taking of the Christ too – the painting in Dublin. He’s either one of the apostles or one of the Roman soldiers, I can’t remember which.
LikeLiked by 1 person
He did… Roman soldier I think
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLike
http://totallyhistory.com/david-with-the-head-of-goliath/
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love Klimt’s paintings!
LikeLiked by 1 person
So do I. So lush and evocative.
LikeLike
I love all the pictures but maybe the top one most. You know, I’d not heard of Judith, the other two yes but not her
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you Madeleine that is why I included the story as she wouldn’t be anyway as familiar as the other two today, but several symbolist artist painted her.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m glad I learned a new thing
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for a great story and wonderful art. I love anything by Klimpt but these examples of painting of the human form are outstanding!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you. It was originally going to be just Klimt but I like making random connections and the Caravaggio and Gentileschi are outstanding.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They certainly are!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Peter
LikeLiked by 1 person
The older woman’s facial expression in the first picture is fantastic
LikeLiked by 1 person
On the Caravaggio?… well drunken gambling whoring bisexual murderer or not his art is superlative and the way he portrayed expression is without parallel
LikeLike
Yeah that one, it is excellent haha
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah yes: the delights of chiaro-oscuro. nd there’s nobody quite like Caravaggio … very good one …
LikeLiked by 1 person
I thought you would appreciate this Roger… I know your fondness for the baroque… as for Caravaggio what can I say… awe inspiring just doesn’t cover it
LikeLiked by 1 person
He is one of my favorite painters. It’s partly the light and dark, but also the tricks with perspective … Velasquez is the painter closest to him for excellence and innovation, I feel.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Seeing Caravaggio surrounded by other painters in a museum is a revelation, you are drawn to his work, he kills masterpieces, they seem watery and insipid compared to Caravaggio. See I know a little beyond Surrealism and Symbolism, though just a little.
LikeLiked by 1 person
After wandering around the Prado and the 19th C art museum in Madrid, I hit the Reina Sofia with Picasso and Dali and Miro (etc). I will never forget the way those paintings lifted themselves off the wall and demanded that you looked at them. I know just what you mean.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I suppose it what makes the difference between good art and great art…technique is one thing but some artists demand your attention. I am glad you liked because I did half include the Baroque for you Roger.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much. “How do you define Baroque?” “When you’re out of Monet.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hmmm that is some terrible punning going on there Roger though it is still funny.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My students either loved it or hated it: smiles or boos.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love Carroll so I love puns… even though the Ines that make you groan while laughing
LikeLiked by 1 person
We call him Tortoise because he taught us … I remember the nick-names we gave our teachers in school … marvelous …
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was a foul mouthed young rebel/joker at school so I will not repeat my nicknames for the teachers.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting … some of ours were marvelous … Giles and Chalky … Jimmy Edwards and Mr. Dimwitty had nothing on what we drew up. One teacher with a bad temper … Dunlop … because he always ‘blew up’! Oh dear … cease and desist …
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mine weren’t as witty as yours…more Swiftian malice than anything else.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We had some of that too!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Love the Klimt, and likely would have taken longer to notice the head in the corner had you not described the history and the piece. Learn something new every day. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
You know me Emily… I am very trying.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow, there is certainly a big difference in the first painting vs the second two! I feel like I’ve seen the first of the beheading ones before…
LikeLiked by 1 person
The baroque always tried to capture the most dramatic moment… whereas the Symbolist were much more interested in abnormal psychological states. The Caravaggio is quite famous and absolutely brilliant. Thanks for commenting Vic
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, that difference definitely comes through!
LikeLike
Yes, the connection of Gentileschi to Caravaggio is amazingly good to be seen! And her scene appears even slightly more vivid than his, in my opinion. Awesome post, Mr Cake. Thank you!
LikeLiked by 1 person
My pleasure, yes her painting is excellent, really conveys the rather gruesome scene.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So True!
LikeLiked by 1 person