The Blessed Virgin Chastising The Infant Jesus Before Three Witnesses-Max Ernst 1926Max Ernst is the complete Surrealist artist. With Johannes Baargeld he formed Cologne Dada and organized the infamous 1920 Cologne Dada Fair which had visitors enter the exhibition via the urinals of a beer hall, where they were then greeted by a girl wearing a communion dress reciting pornographic poetry. Inside they were invited to destroy the artworks on display with an axe that Ernst had thoughtfully provided.. Ernst was a key figure in the ‘mouvement flou’, the transitional period between Dada and Surrealism. Under the banner of Surrealism Ernst experimented with photo-montage, collage, collage novels; various automatism techniques including decalcomania, frottage and grattage. His visionary figurative paintings set the benchmark for the realistic depiction of dream and hallucinatory states that was to figure so prominently in the movement.
The Blessed Virgin Chastising The Infant Jesus Before Three Witness from 1926 was a considerable success de scandale when first exhibited. The outraged Bishop of Cologne promptly closed down the exhibition. He was right to detect more than a whiff of blasphemy. Ernst is implying that the Infant Jesus wasn’t perfect and just like any other child his behaviour could result in a severe punishment. The Virgin maintains her halo while administering the spanking yet the Infant’s crown has dropped to the ground. And all the while Paul Eluard, Andre Breton and the artist pruriently look on.
I love the imagery in this. Serene and yet so provocative and iconoclastic. There are so many ways one could read this art and that is the sort of thing I enjoy in works of art.
Provacative to the extreme. Not just the painting. The exhibition? Destroy the art? And I’m assuming Ernst was not a Trinitarian? God incarnate could never be less than perfect
I am such a fan of this painting, as I have mentioned previously. I do see its origins a bit differently as, to my eye, it appears to have been influenced by deChirico (don’t laugh!). I refer to that infamous Portrait of Apollinaire …. the bust with sunglasses, the mystery figure looming in the background and its angular walls – three areas of interest that together present some form of context. Here, I see three surrealists whispering, we cannot know what their thoughts are about what they witness in an alley out of public view. Considering the state of Europe at the time, and I think we can all agree that the horrors of WWI called into question whether God would permit such atrocities …. some would say, surely not….others might deny his existence…so the question is posed as we see in this piece….would Mary have spanked Jesus? It seems that Breton was anxious to claim that if a piece could create a stir, that he would claim it was surreal…but I don’t see it in this piece. It makes a direct statement/question that is easily interpreted. Am I wrong?
De Chirico was definitely a big influence…Ernst was very big on blasphemy… Witness His Freudian homo-erotic Pieta… I don’t think our views conflict that much and you are right.
Alex, so glad you chose this. I first saw this painting as a cover for a psychology book (no surprise!) and was smitten. I looked it up when the internet began (yes, that’s how long ago it was!) and found the artist, but of all his work this one strikes home the most. I suppose it’s the daring and the simplicity at the same time, the almost cubist style of abstract and realistic joining hands, and also it reminds me of a lot of latino artwork. Some would say it’s merely shock art or blasphemy but i think that’s reducing it to its simplest interpretation. I believe as you say, there is an erotica there and a huge influence from psychology and I find that fascinating. Thank you!
Thanks for the detailed comments Feather. Ernst knew his Freud very well and a lot of paintings from this period reference psychoanalysis. I hope you enjoy the rest of the series on Ernst.
Hmm. Strange…I already commented on this….and ‘liked’ this post. Yet, my comment is not here…and the little star is not illuminated. I shall try one more time:
OUCH!
It’s a very disturbing painting on so many levels. Courageous, too. I love the walls, sky, and spaces … also the fallen halo. There are some enlightening comments below the line too. Thank you. Great work, as usual.
Thank you I hope you enjoy… these were written a year ago I am posting them because they are buried in the archives and because I want to concentrate on my novel that I am too lazy to write
That’s because you’re a songbird at heart and you flip from branch to branch and word to word and flower to flower and idea to idea. There’s nothing wrong with that: but the novel will take a lot longer to write!
You’ve been to Cologne, if I recall correctly. And I assume you’ve seen this live and in person? Did you ever get over to The Tate to see Paul Nash? It finishes at the end of the month, so there’s still time.
I have seen the Ernst… Cologne was his hometown so they have a good collection… not sure I have time unfortunately… I really should because I like Nash
Just…wow. Lots to process here. I think it’s quite realist to think Jesus as an infant/child would be just like the rest of us…so there is realism in his surrealism, then. 😉 But, no doubt scandalous to many believers, I’m sure. It makes me laugh, not at the act that is happening, because I’m not a believer in corporal punishment, but because it’s almost a relief to see normality in something that so many want to keep locked in a kind of chaste sanctity that denies truth. I don’t know if any of that made sense…
You are right on the money here, the whole idea is to show a domestic reality that Jesus must have encountered as a baby (as they certainly did believe in corporeal punishment back in the back, spare the rod, spoil the child).it is a marvellous thought provoking painting. Thanks for the lengthly comment Em.
I think it is meant to be humorous, just imagine the Infant Jesus getting spanked for being naughty. And Eluard, Breton and Ernst looking on. The Dada show looked like a lot of fun too.
Saw this on a book cover at 19 just adored it!!!
LikeLiked by 2 people
it does tick all the right boxes…i first saw ernst in a magazine, the elephant cerberus when i was about 10…havent been right since
LikeLiked by 1 person
The insane creativity, mind blowing
LikeLiked by 1 person
For some reason alot of my recent posts concern blasphemy…i dont know why
LikeLiked by 1 person
They’re superb!♡
LikeLike
Thank you…I like Clovis trouille sexy nuns even though they are in questionable taste
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hahaha!!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
And he stayed true to that vision
LikeLike
Reblogged this on examining the odd.
LikeLike
I love the imagery in this. Serene and yet so provocative and iconoclastic. There are so many ways one could read this art and that is the sort of thing I enjoy in works of art.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you it is a great painting.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can see how this would cause a stir! 😳😃
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Provacative to the extreme. Not just the painting. The exhibition? Destroy the art? And I’m assuming Ernst was not a Trinitarian? God incarnate could never be less than perfect
LikeLiked by 1 person
He was brought up a Catholic but like most Surrealists he was a mutant atheist though with strong mystical and occult leanings
LikeLiked by 1 person
The exhibition sounds very provocative… And it was almost a hundred years ago!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes! And this was in post WWI (?) Germany?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes though he moved to Paris in the early 20’s
LikeLiked by 1 person
Are you only just following me?
LikeLiked by 1 person
No! I’ve been following you all this time! Somehow must’ve bumped the following ‘button’
LikeLiked by 1 person
I know I was only joking
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve got to do this on something other than my phone. Too much room for error
LikeLiked by 1 person
But I corrected it immediately
LikeLike
I am such a fan of this painting, as I have mentioned previously. I do see its origins a bit differently as, to my eye, it appears to have been influenced by deChirico (don’t laugh!). I refer to that infamous Portrait of Apollinaire …. the bust with sunglasses, the mystery figure looming in the background and its angular walls – three areas of interest that together present some form of context. Here, I see three surrealists whispering, we cannot know what their thoughts are about what they witness in an alley out of public view. Considering the state of Europe at the time, and I think we can all agree that the horrors of WWI called into question whether God would permit such atrocities …. some would say, surely not….others might deny his existence…so the question is posed as we see in this piece….would Mary have spanked Jesus? It seems that Breton was anxious to claim that if a piece could create a stir, that he would claim it was surreal…but I don’t see it in this piece. It makes a direct statement/question that is easily interpreted. Am I wrong?
LikeLiked by 1 person
De Chirico was definitely a big influence…Ernst was very big on blasphemy… Witness His Freudian homo-erotic Pieta… I don’t think our views conflict that much and you are right.
LikeLike
You could post this daily….and I would (once again) praise Ernst….love this.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you… well there is a whole week of posts about Max Ernst this week
LikeLike
Ouch!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed
LikeLiked by 1 person
Alex, so glad you chose this. I first saw this painting as a cover for a psychology book (no surprise!) and was smitten. I looked it up when the internet began (yes, that’s how long ago it was!) and found the artist, but of all his work this one strikes home the most. I suppose it’s the daring and the simplicity at the same time, the almost cubist style of abstract and realistic joining hands, and also it reminds me of a lot of latino artwork. Some would say it’s merely shock art or blasphemy but i think that’s reducing it to its simplest interpretation. I believe as you say, there is an erotica there and a huge influence from psychology and I find that fascinating. Thank you!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the detailed comments Feather. Ernst knew his Freud very well and a lot of paintings from this period reference psychoanalysis. I hope you enjoy the rest of the series on Ernst.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hmm. Strange…I already commented on this….and ‘liked’ this post. Yet, my comment is not here…and the little star is not illuminated. I shall try one more time:
OUCH!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sorry I just hadn’t checked my messages. Star and ouch are now in place.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you Mr. Cake 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
No problem
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s a very disturbing painting on so many levels. Courageous, too. I love the walls, sky, and spaces … also the fallen halo. There are some enlightening comments below the line too. Thank you. Great work, as usual.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you… there is a whole week of Max Ernst so I hope you don’t get bored. It is a stunning painting, now in the Ludwig museum in Cologne
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t think I’ll get bored … not at all … so much to see and think about …
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you I hope you enjoy… these were written a year ago I am posting them because they are buried in the archives and because I want to concentrate on my novel that I am too lazy to write
LikeLiked by 1 person
Novel writing is a grind. You just put your nose down and get on with it, day after day, no distractions, my friend.
LikeLiked by 1 person
But I am distracted by distraction…I see a butterfly and then a bird and then and then
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s because you’re a songbird at heart and you flip from branch to branch and word to word and flower to flower and idea to idea. There’s nothing wrong with that: but the novel will take a lot longer to write!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh dear now I feel truly discouraged
LikeLiked by 1 person
No need to feel down: just keep hopping and hoping. You’ll come through.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mmmm that remains to be seen Roger but thanks for the vote of confidence.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If it’s meant to be, it will be. Sometimes it’s a question of blind faith!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just have to take the leap
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yup: that’s art for you. Love or leave it: but straight from the heart.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’ve been to Cologne, if I recall correctly. And I assume you’ve seen this live and in person? Did you ever get over to The Tate to see Paul Nash? It finishes at the end of the month, so there’s still time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have seen the Ernst… Cologne was his hometown so they have a good collection… not sure I have time unfortunately… I really should because I like Nash
LikeLiked by 1 person
You should if you can. Is it so very arduous to get across the Irish Sea?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not arduous just a question of time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just…wow. Lots to process here. I think it’s quite realist to think Jesus as an infant/child would be just like the rest of us…so there is realism in his surrealism, then. 😉 But, no doubt scandalous to many believers, I’m sure. It makes me laugh, not at the act that is happening, because I’m not a believer in corporal punishment, but because it’s almost a relief to see normality in something that so many want to keep locked in a kind of chaste sanctity that denies truth. I don’t know if any of that made sense…
LikeLiked by 1 person
You are right on the money here, the whole idea is to show a domestic reality that Jesus must have encountered as a baby (as they certainly did believe in corporeal punishment back in the back, spare the rod, spoil the child).it is a marvellous thought provoking painting. Thanks for the lengthly comment Em.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Love especially the old axe ploy… Hehe. G-good job, Mr Cake!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you… I think it would have been interesting entering the hall through the toilet and hearing that poetry…that would be a ride awakening!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Another time, so many passed opportunities! Damn!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I know… the thing is to be in the right place at the right time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Riveting!
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is a beautiful painting. Why do I find the subject humorous? That’s blasphemous for sure!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think it is meant to be humorous, just imagine the Infant Jesus getting spanked for being naughty. And Eluard, Breton and Ernst looking on. The Dada show looked like a lot of fun too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Surely tongue in cheek. I love it. I’m sure this work was rewarded with righteous indignation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It was indeed…nothing like a good scandal.
LikeLiked by 1 person