The Phenomenon of Ecstasy

tumblr_m57f1wxnr41rvulvgo1_1280[1]
Phenomene de l’extase -Salvador Dali 1933
Salvador Dali’s arresting photo-montage The Phenomenon of Ecstasy which features the photographic studies of Charcot’s female hysterics, originally accompanied the artist’s essay on the irrational aspects of art nouveau architecture; in particular the buildings of fellow Catalan Antoni Gaudi, in the magazine Minotaure. His contention that “the repugnant can be transformed into the beautiful” through an ecstasy achieved by continuous erotic activity and that the sexual abandon resulting from hysteria leads to a transformation of perception in art, architecture and indeed modern life markedly shows the influence of the Symbolist and Decadent movements of the latter 19th century upon the Surrealists.

Advertisements

35 thoughts on “The Phenomenon of Ecstasy

  1. The kind of montage that grabs your attention. I had thought “hysterics” had a bad connotation, but I just Googled the definition, and it’s “exhibiting excessive or uncontrollable emotion.” So, ecstasy. I can imagine showing multiple photos of female pleasure in 1933 would’ve caused quite the controversy among viewers.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. The decadents in France at the end of the last century were obsessed with the hysterics and were unbelievably misogynistic, so I tied that up with Dali’s montage which is both shocking and beautiful. Have a look at my posts under symbolism where I go into further detail on the decadents

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I just read an article in the Independent UK, that “estacy” experienced by our male ancestors is an evolutionary incentive to keep a male attached/loyal to the same female to support their offspring. Since estacy is not essential to reproduction it has to have some other function. In this study which is about female expression, via the male’s rational gaze I think it’s classic psychological projection. Of course, I say this because of the use of the words “hysteria” and “repugnant” with “beautiful” female subjects. Men have always dominated sexual discourse so it makes sense that they would describe the female subject as irrational. I should also point out the implicit assumption that a woman enjoys intercourse. Anthropological studies have concluded that the female orgasm is completely irrelevant to reproduction or the formation of lasting interpersonal or familial bonds. Again, classical psychology and classical projection.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. A lot of good points here. You have a certain divide because the Surrealists aimed for the irrational yet had a fear of it. In the Decadent imagination women are more natural, more instinctive and therefore more irrational. This was seen by the Decadents as both a source of strength and weakness. The experiments performed on female patients by Charcot are absolutely bizarre. Dali views are of course completely mad cap. The virulent misogyny of the late 19th century is a feature of not only the Decadents but also Strindberg and Nietzsche (least we forget his whip

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Exactly. Are you put that was a belly full of laughs. Of course, I knew you were fully aware that there was some undertone of misogyny going on. I just couldn’t phrase it that way because my brain is right now still enjoying the snow pecan latte I just had at Starbucks.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. The misogyny of the Decadents is very hard to ignore, though that doesn’t discredit their work in my opinion, it definitely has to be factored into account. That is a very fancy coffee, Decadent in a different way.

        Liked by 1 person

      3. Error correction – Sorry, I meant “how you put that” was funny. I’m still trying to get Siri to behave himself. He is totally hysterical. I might have to whip him, Decadent style. Have a great Wednesday.

        Liked by 1 person

      1. I want to preface this by saying, “for me”, I believe you can dislike an individual/artist, does that diminish the quality of their art? No, especially if you are able to take it in for the pure sake of art, in doing so it may even change your initial feelings about that particular individual/artist, example my buddy André Breton. When I look at the great artists, I believe they are one in the same, they are their greatest artwork, just as we spoke of Warhol, he himself was his greatest creation. But what do I know, I’m just a lowly artist.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s