The Portrait Of My Soul-Man Ray 1922Man Ray’s curious photograph of the Marchesa Luisa Casati, who desired to be a living work of art and was the wild-eyed muse of the Italian decadent, Futurist and fascist Gabriele D’Annunzio. Entitled The Portrait Of My Soul, the fact that Man Ray decided to portray his soul as feminine seems to anticipate Jung’s theory of the anima/animus, however Man Ray was well versed in the same esoteric doctrines that so profoundly influenced the Swiss psychiatrist.
Absolutely.. It is interesting because Man Ray is often accursed ( with some justification) of being one of the worse offenders of the male gaze. It also shows the occult influences of surrealism as the whole doctrine that your soul is the opposite gender is an old alchemical theory.
I don’t see it as an offense. I see it as appreciation. It is necessary for the survival of the species that our souls contain both male and female aspects. There must be balance in nature. We are all one…not separate. There is no such thing as opposites. Yin and Yang. Your posts have inspired me to dig a bit into Man Ray. Any suggestions to start?
I have loads of man Ray on the site, a lot of the dreams of desire series is man Ray…a few of my stories on the site the picture is his…I am really just hoping you go searching on my site. Thank you
It is a curious photograph indeed. It looks like a double exposure on her eyes which is gives that effect. Man Ray liked to break the rules to get results.
Well not necessarily limited to alchemy, although alchemy abounds in androgynes, marriages of the Sun and Moon, the Red King and the White Queen, and other dense and bizarre symbolism. One of the aims of esotericism was the reconciliation of opposites (as I see it) male and female, night and day, matter and spirit. Jung’s theory of the anime and animus was that individuation could only happen when the person had reconciled with their anime/animus which is the opposite gender. One of Jung’s most famous works is Alchemy and Psychology which has a number of bizarre and beautiful alchemical engravings and drawings. By the bye Balthus son produced a number of books on alchemy and was kind of the resident expert for the King’s Road set in Swinging London in the sixties, including Mick Jagger. Balthus was the King of Cats before I started my reign.
Reconciliation as in how they work together/balance each other? Or come to terms with (for lack of a better term)? Our physical bodies reflect that type of balance – male and female. It’s a valid idea… You are following in some interesting footsteps, your majesty
I always make connections where there are probably none…as above, so below. Microcosm and Macrocosm. In hermeticism in would be that there are no opposites would be a return to a paradisal state.
Hmm the alchemists were very oblique and there is a fair amount of Gnosticism in that and the gnostics had a very complicated view of sin. For instance if you take the as above, so below dictum literally then the more you sin the closer to god you get. Though other sects were very ascetic. I told you not to get me started.
I suppose if you look at it in the respect that the worse the sinner the more the need for redemption… Also depends on how you define sin. Based on a unique set of standards it’s a falling short of the mark. Who sets the standard? The flawed god of the Gnostics?
Even in chiropractic philosophy we discuss the limitations of matter. Inhibiting the flow of mental energy/innate intelligence/universal intelligence. Maybe not evil, that implies acting with determination, but rather incomplete or if you will “sinful” as in falling short of the mark.
I know H was all about contrasts, but I don’t think of strife that way I suppose. I mean simply the definition of the word. I think of it strictly in a negative sense. Turmoil, upheaval – not so negative. But is that what you mean?
I’m not sure I knew that. Didn’t Blake argue in favor of love? Not the false love you are obliged to offer. As in “duty is an ugly mistress”? That’s one of my favorite Emerson quotes
Blake was all about love, desire, passion. Also a gnostic… the demiurge Nobodaddy creates the prison of the senses five. Imagination and desire are the key to transcending the prison
It’s been a long time since I read Doors by Huxley. I was of course (at that time) open to um… replicating his experiences… Blake had a far reaching influence: the beat poets, Jim Morrison and of course my beloved Yeats. I’ve never looked deeply into his work however…
He did indeed, Yeats was a big champion. Songs of Innocence &I Experience and the Marriage of Heaven & Hell would be the places to look… as well as his art
The only constant is mutability. OK I will stop with the mystic cake routine for a bit. I have a good idea for my next post, something different but still fits hopefully.
Well i have a revised post coming out in about 5 mins, another one of my Surrealist Women series. I just dont want to put to much racy stuff on the site or people might get the wrong idea, however that ship has left the port and is in the middle of the ocean by now I think.
Thank you so much. I do live the Surrealists and it is a good subject because they touch upon politics, religion, esotericism, symbolism. Whereas other art movements like cubism are excellent but it limited to the technical aspects of art, though I am sure you could broaden it a bit. Sorry rambling here thank you for the compliment.
Have you ever seen this movie ‘Midnight in Paris’? I think you would get a kick out of it, a 21st century guy time travels in Paris and has some encounters with Salvador Dali and Man Ray 🙂
Yes I have. I love the bit when he is talking to Luis Bunuel and he gives him the idea for The Exterminating Angel and Bunuel is perplexed by the whole idea of them not leaving
I am not too sure. She really was wild-eyed and quite the character. I try to find out where possible about the models in the paintings and photographs. For some reason they seem so much more interesting than the models of recently, though that could just be a misplaced nostalgia for a period I never lived in.
Excellent… Such a visionary, with this portrait revealing the feminine aspects of his masculine being. In jungian terminology: his Anima (meaning: “a man´s feminine nature representing Eros or Love, and also the Unconsciouness)….. Very clever of you to highlight Jung´s theory of the Integrated Self. Love & best wishes, dear Cake. Happy week ahead 😀
Thank you my friend…glad you enjoyed this post. Both Man Ray and Duchamp make extensive use of esoteric motifs and Jung was certainly influenced by Alchemy and Gnosticism
The influence of the feminine is important in all aspects of life, including art.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Absolutely.. It is interesting because Man Ray is often accursed ( with some justification) of being one of the worse offenders of the male gaze. It also shows the occult influences of surrealism as the whole doctrine that your soul is the opposite gender is an old alchemical theory.
LikeLike
I don’t see it as an offense. I see it as appreciation. It is necessary for the survival of the species that our souls contain both male and female aspects. There must be balance in nature. We are all one…not separate. There is no such thing as opposites. Yin and Yang. Your posts have inspired me to dig a bit into Man Ray. Any suggestions to start?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have loads of man Ray on the site, a lot of the dreams of desire series is man Ray…a few of my stories on the site the picture is his…I am really just hoping you go searching on my site. Thank you
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I notice the abundance of his work on your site. It’s inspiring! I dig your aesthetic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The surrealists were really influential in photography
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for liking the aesthetic
LikeLike
It is pretty interesting that he portrayed his soul as female. The blurred effect is unusual- making her already large eyes look enormous
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is a curious photograph indeed. It looks like a double exposure on her eyes which is gives that effect. Man Ray liked to break the rules to get results.
LikeLike
Also, care to elaborate on the alchemical theory of the opposite gender of the soul? Or too rabbity?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well not necessarily limited to alchemy, although alchemy abounds in androgynes, marriages of the Sun and Moon, the Red King and the White Queen, and other dense and bizarre symbolism. One of the aims of esotericism was the reconciliation of opposites (as I see it) male and female, night and day, matter and spirit. Jung’s theory of the anime and animus was that individuation could only happen when the person had reconciled with their anime/animus which is the opposite gender. One of Jung’s most famous works is Alchemy and Psychology which has a number of bizarre and beautiful alchemical engravings and drawings. By the bye Balthus son produced a number of books on alchemy and was kind of the resident expert for the King’s Road set in Swinging London in the sixties, including Mick Jagger. Balthus was the King of Cats before I started my reign.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reconciliation as in how they work together/balance each other? Or come to terms with (for lack of a better term)? Our physical bodies reflect that type of balance – male and female. It’s a valid idea… You are following in some interesting footsteps, your majesty
LikeLiked by 1 person
I always make connections where there are probably none…as above, so below. Microcosm and Macrocosm. In hermeticism in would be that there are no opposites would be a return to a paradisal state.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The removal of evil to no longer oppose good. However, the potential is always there isn’t it?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hmm the alchemists were very oblique and there is a fair amount of Gnosticism in that and the gnostics had a very complicated view of sin. For instance if you take the as above, so below dictum literally then the more you sin the closer to god you get. Though other sects were very ascetic. I told you not to get me started.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I suppose if you look at it in the respect that the worse the sinner the more the need for redemption… Also depends on how you define sin. Based on a unique set of standards it’s a falling short of the mark. Who sets the standard? The flawed god of the Gnostics?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly, so Eve was a heroine and Cain was a hero. As above, so below, heaven and hell are a mirror so the depths of hell is the height of heaven.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hmmm. And in the middle, a bland mediocrity
LikeLiked by 1 person
Base matter
LikeLiked by 1 person
A starting point. Of course.
LikeLiked by 1 person
But to the gnostics matter is inherently evil that has to be transcended
LikeLiked by 1 person
Even in chiropractic philosophy we discuss the limitations of matter. Inhibiting the flow of mental energy/innate intelligence/universal intelligence. Maybe not evil, that implies acting with determination, but rather incomplete or if you will “sinful” as in falling short of the mark.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hmmm sinful and limited…that is interesting. Gnosticism was a very pessimistic philosophy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m going to be up all night thinking about this stuff. Goodnight, Mystic One.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Strife is justice
LikeLiked by 1 person
Justice for what?
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is just justice…Heraclitus
LikeLiked by 1 person
But not always
LikeLiked by 1 person
He was referring to contraries… creation and destruction, flow and ebb… the strife balances out and is just
LikeLiked by 1 person
I know H was all about contrasts, but I don’t think of strife that way I suppose. I mean simply the definition of the word. I think of it strictly in a negative sense. Turmoil, upheaval – not so negative. But is that what you mean?
LikeLiked by 1 person
More or less, don’t forget Blake’s opposition is true friendship
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m not sure I knew that. Didn’t Blake argue in favor of love? Not the false love you are obliged to offer. As in “duty is an ugly mistress”? That’s one of my favorite Emerson quotes
LikeLiked by 1 person
Blake was all about love, desire, passion. Also a gnostic… the demiurge Nobodaddy creates the prison of the senses five. Imagination and desire are the key to transcending the prison
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s what I thought. Then what do you mean his opposition was true friendship?
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is in his proverbs of hell from the marriage of heaven & hell… to oppose is friendship, strife is justice. Mystic cake rules.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Then I strongly oppose you. (See what I did there?)
LikeLiked by 1 person
I did… now we need to cleanse the doors of perception
LikeLiked by 1 person
Aldous Huxley. Yes, let’s
LikeLiked by 1 person
From Blake
LikeLiked by 1 person
A huge influencer.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed, I am very partial to Blake indeed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s been a long time since I read Doors by Huxley. I was of course (at that time) open to um… replicating his experiences… Blake had a far reaching influence: the beat poets, Jim Morrison and of course my beloved Yeats. I’ve never looked deeply into his work however…
LikeLiked by 1 person
He did indeed, Yeats was a big champion. Songs of Innocence &I Experience and the Marriage of Heaven & Hell would be the places to look… as well as his art
LikeLiked by 1 person
I need a rainy afternoon, complete isolation and perhaps a power failure so I can catch up on all my reading… Thank you for the guidance
LikeLiked by 1 person
No problem… is isolation possibly any longer in this world?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Possible, but extremely difficult and certainly fleeting.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The only constant is mutability. OK I will stop with the mystic cake routine for a bit. I have a good idea for my next post, something different but still fits hopefully.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, excellent! I look forward to it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Actually will probably be in a couple of posts time, second guessing myself.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh Cake… You shouldn’t second guess. Really
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well i have a revised post coming out in about 5 mins, another one of my Surrealist Women series. I just dont want to put to much racy stuff on the site or people might get the wrong idea, however that ship has left the port and is in the middle of the ocean by now I think.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes… 9 of 10 women on your blog are completely naked so….
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ok only clothed photographs from now on.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Um…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Actually I have blown it already…from know on afterwards
LikeLiked by 1 person
I misspelt anima in my previous comment.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Right, not Japanese cartoons, I figured…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes sorry about that, my typos on comments are terrible. Need to proof them between.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If you were too perfect, you would be intimidating
LikeLiked by 1 person
But I try to be intimidating, damn.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh um yes right! Of course you are. Very. Extremely intimidating.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you
LikeLike
This is REALLY COOL!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you… glad you like it. I wish I could be cool, ah well that ship has sailed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nah Cake, you are COOL! Putting together all this stuff is very cool 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much. I do live the Surrealists and it is a good subject because they touch upon politics, religion, esotericism, symbolism. Whereas other art movements like cubism are excellent but it limited to the technical aspects of art, though I am sure you could broaden it a bit. Sorry rambling here thank you for the compliment.
LikeLiked by 1 person
No problem, I love the surrealists too.
Have you ever seen this movie ‘Midnight in Paris’? I think you would get a kick out of it, a 21st century guy time travels in Paris and has some encounters with Salvador Dali and Man Ray 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes I have. I love the bit when he is talking to Luis Bunuel and he gives him the idea for The Exterminating Angel and Bunuel is perplexed by the whole idea of them not leaving
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, great movie! I liked Dali’s persistence of ‘the rhinoceros’ 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes that is good as well, the 20’s do seem great
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh wow. That’s quite a picture! And quite the interesting background about it. I’m curious how the double-eye effect happened.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I am not too sure. She really was wild-eyed and quite the character. I try to find out where possible about the models in the paintings and photographs. For some reason they seem so much more interesting than the models of recently, though that could just be a misplaced nostalgia for a period I never lived in.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellent… Such a visionary, with this portrait revealing the feminine aspects of his masculine being. In jungian terminology: his Anima (meaning: “a man´s feminine nature representing Eros or Love, and also the Unconsciouness)….. Very clever of you to highlight Jung´s theory of the Integrated Self. Love & best wishes, dear Cake. Happy week ahead 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you my friend…glad you enjoyed this post. Both Man Ray and Duchamp make extensive use of esoteric motifs and Jung was certainly influenced by Alchemy and Gnosticism
LikeLiked by 1 person